Find the complete solution of the following differential equation:

Solution:
We are given the following: ; ; and .
Part A
To solve for the final velocity, we are going to use the formula
Substituting the given values:
Part B
Let be the time it takes to reach the finish line without accelerating:
Now let be the distance traveled during the 7 seconds of acceleration. We know so
Let be the time it will take the rider at the constant final velocity to complete the race:
So the total time it will take the accelerating rider to reach the finish line is
Finally, let be the time saved. So
Part C
For rider 2, we are given the following values: ;
Let be the time it takes for rider 2 to reach the finish line.
We are going to use the formula
Substituting the given values:
The time difference is
Therefore, he finishes 4.2 s after the winner.
When the other racer reaches the finish line, he has been traveling at 11.8 m/s for 4.2 seconds, so the other racer finishes
behind the other racer.
Since the champion plays better than the father, it seems reasonable that fewer sets should be played with the champion. On the other hand, the middle set is the key one, because Elmer cannot have two wins in a row without winning the middle one. Let C stand for the champion, F for father, and W and L for win and loss by Elmer. Let f be the probability of Elmer’s winning any set from his father, c the corresponding probability of winning from the champion. The table shows only possible prize-winning sequences together with their probabilities, given independence between sets, for the two choices.
Set with:
Father First
F | C | F | Probability |
W | W | W | fcf |
W | W | L | fc(1-f) |
L | W | W | (1-f)cf |
Total | fc(2-f) |
Champion First
C | F | C | Probability |
W | W | W | cfc |
W | W | L | cf(1-c) |
L | W | W | (1-c)fc |
Total | fc(2-c) |
Since Elmer is more likely to best his father than to beat the champion, f is larger than c, and 2-f is smaller than 2-c, and so Elmer should choose CFC. For example, for f=0.8, c=0.4, the chance of winning the prize with FCF is 0.384, that for CFC is 0.512. Thus, the importance of winning the middle game outweighs the disadvantage of playing the champion twice.
Many of us have a tendency to suppose that the higher the expected number of successes, the higher the probability of winning a prize, and often this supposition is useful. But occasionally a problem has special conditions that destroy this reasoning by analogy. In our problem, the expected number of wins under CFC is 2c+f, which is less than the expected number of wins for FCF, 2f+c. In our example with f=0.8 and c=0.4, these means are 1.6 and 2.0 in that order. This opposition of answers gives the problem flavor.
Just to set the pattern, let us do a numerical example first. Suppose there were 5 red and 2 black socks; then the probability of the first sock’s being red would be 5/(5+2). If the first were red, the probability of the second’s being red would be 4/(4+2), because one red sock has already been removed. The product of these two numbers is the probability that both socks are red:
This result is close to 1/2, but we need exactly 1/2. Now let us go at the problem algebraically.
Let there be red and black socks. The probability of the first sock’s being red is ; and if the first sock is red, the probability of the second’s being red now that a red has been removed is . Then we require the probability that both are red to be , or
One could just start with and try successive values of , then go to and try again, and so on. That would get the answer quickly. Or we could play along with a little more mathematics. Notice that
Therefore, we can create the inequalities
Taking the square roots, we have, for .
From the first inequality we get
or
From the second we get
or all told
For , must be greater than 2.414 and less than 3.414, and so the candidate is . For , we get
And so, the smallest number of socks is 4.
Beyond this, we investigate even values of .
is between | eligible | ||
2 | 5.8, 4.8 | 5 | |
4 | 10.7, 9.7 | 10 | |
6 | 15.5, 14.5 | 15 |
And so, 21 is the smallest number of socks when b is even. If we were to go on and ask for further values of r and b so that the probability of two red socks is 1/2, we would be wise to appreciate that this is a problem in the theory of numbers. It happens to lead to a famous result in Diophantine Analysis obtained from Pell’s equation. Try r = 85, b = 35.
Solution:
We are given the following: ; ; and .
Part A
To compute for the average acceleration , we are going to use the formula
Substituting the given values, we have
Part B
We are given the following: ; ; and .
Since we do not have any information on time, we are going to use the formula
To compute for the final velocity, we have
Substituting the given values:
Part C
The final velocity is greater than that used to find the average acceleration because the assumption of constant acceleration is not valid for a dragster. A dragster changes gears and would have a greater acceleration in first gear than second gear than third gear, etc. The acceleration would be greatest at the beginning, so it would not be accelerating at 32.6 m/s2 during the last few meters, but substantially less, and the final velocity would be less than .
Solution:
The hydrologic cycle is a continuous process in which water is evaporated from water surfaces and the oceans, moves inland as moist are masses, and produces precipitation if the correct vertical lifting conditions exist.
A portion of precipitation (rainfall) is retained in the soil near where it falls and returns to the atmosphere via evaporation (the conversion of water vapor from a water surface) and transpiration (the loss of water vapor through plant tissue and leaves). Combined loss is called evapotranspiration and is a maximum value if the water supply in the soil moisture conditions and soil may reenter channels layer as interflow or may percolate to recharge the shallow groundwater. The remaining portion of the precipitation becomes overland flow or direct runoff which flows generally in a downgradient direction to accumulate in local streams that then flow into rivers.
SOLUTION:
A straight substitution of leads to the indeterminate form which is meaningless.
Therefore, to evaluate the limit of the given function, we proceed as follows
Solution:
Part A
We are given the following: ; ; and
We are required to solve for time, . We are going to use the formula
Substituting the given values, we have
If we simplify and rearrange the terms into a general quadratic equation, we have
Solve for using the quadratic formula. We are given .
There are two values of that can satisfy the quadratic equation.
Discard as it can be seen from the problem that this is not a feasible solution. So, we have
Part B
We have the same given values from part a. We are going to solve in the formula
So we have
Part C
We are given the same values as in the previous parts, except that for the value of since we should incorporate the length of the train. For the distance, , we have
To solve for time , we are going to use the formula
If we rearrange the formula into a general quadratic equation and solve for using the quadratic formula, we come up with
Substituting the given values:
Part D
We have the same given values. We are going to solve for in the equation
Substituting the given values:
You must be logged in to post a comment.